The industry myth that’s quietly draining your budget.
Why Bad Creative Costs More
The ROI of Craft and how creative quality outperforms volume, budget, and distribution every time
There’s a funny thing happening in marketing lately. Brands are producing more content than ever: posts, campaigns, videos, reels, shorts, carousels, TikToks, pre-rolls, LinkedIn think pieces, and seventeen versions of the same banner resized into oblivion. It reminds me of surfing through midday motel TV: endless reruns, pharmaceutical ads, and the faint hope something decent will appear before you give up.
Anyone who scrolls social media for five minutes can practically hear the collective groan and exhalation of creative fatigue.
We didn’t arrive here by accident. When results dipped, brands didn’t rethink the strategy. They just cranked everything to 11 and hoped the distortion would drown out the flaws. But the harder they leaned on volume, the more the whole thing disintegrated into static.
Creative quality isn’t tied to production spend. Strong low-budget work exists when the concept and execution are aligned. What undermines performance at any budget level is a mismatch. Lavish production hung on weak ideas, or high distribution supporting work that was never strong enough to carry it.
Yes, those tactics can generate a bump. But it’s fleeting—and nowhere near what happens when the idea itself is strong.
For years, creatives have been gaslit with the idea that ‘creative’ is non-fungible, non-tangible, unquantifiable, and therefore unfundable. This is a convenient myth. After all, you don’t have to value what you can’t measure.
And even though this may sound like yet another of my quixotic rants, the data is painfully clear: mediocre creative is more expensive than great creative. Yes, in news that shocks absolutely no one: more.
Mediocre creative doesn’t do the job. It doesn’t cut through, it doesn’t stick, build trust or preference. It just drifts by unnoticed.
And this is wild when you consider the amount of money brands pump into distribution, tools, and measurement dashboards. It’s like pouring high-octane race fuel into the old Toyota Camry your sister abandoned when she ran off to Belgium with Ted on her ‘self-discovery’ tour. It’s still a shitty old car. It’s still not winning land-speed records. And Ted is still a tool.
Procurement and finance control the budgets, but creative quality controls the outcomes. In every channel, every format, every category, creative quality is the single biggest driver of business impact.
Here’s where people usually check out and say, “Well, art is subjective.”
Sure—taste is subjective. But quality isn’t. Quality has receipts: clarity, originality, coherence, emotional truth, and memorability. You don’t have to like a thing to see that it was built by someone who knew what they were doing.
Once you accept that, the math stops being mysterious. Creative quality actually moves the money. Here’s how we know.
Creative Quality Actually Moves the Money
‘The idea is everything’ gets dismissed so often, it might as well be a driftwood sign in Google Sacramento hanging in the staged house next door. And for all the people who treat that line like creative self-indulgence, the numbers say otherwise.
Across several large-scale studies, the same theme appears:
Strong creative delivers the lion’s share of sales lift.
Emotionally sharp ideas beat rational messaging.
High-quality creative amplifies media effectiveness.
Story-driven campaigns show long-tail performance gains.
These are recurring conclusions from multiple independent sources. And honestly, we shouldn’t be surprised. Think about your own habits:
What ads do you actually remember?
What brand films do you share without being prompted?
What content didn’t make you regret the click?
It’s not the spot with the celebrity cameo or the one the algorithm shoved in your face all day. It’s the one that made you feel something. The job isn’t just attention, it’s meaning. That's the real target if you are trying to make any kind of impact for your brand.
People don’t choose brands that bombard them with ‘6–7’ work—good enough to exist, not good enough to matter. They choose brands because the story, the feeling, the tone, or in other words, the idea landed.
And here’s where the fight begins. The traits that drive real results are the same ones leaders write off as creative ego. You see the tension most clearly in the work that gets recognized—commercially and creatively.
A Cannes Lions Award, the global benchmark for high-impact creative work and marketing effectiveness.
Why Awards Matter More Than Anyone Wants to Admit
Say ‘creative awards’ in a boardroom, and finance will roll their eyes so hard you’d think you asked them to expense feelings. But the work that wins awards is usually the same work that wins market share.
Not because awards are magic, but because the conditions that create award-winning work are the same conditions that drive commercial impact. Juries respond to originality, emotion, clarity, and taste. Customers reward the same things.
If your brand never wins anything, that’s not a crisis. But it’s not a stance either. It usually means the work is blending into the wallpaper.
Wallpaper doesn’t move KPIs. Distinctive work does. Awards are simply the receipts.
Production Value: Not the Enemy of Authenticity (Unless You Force It To Be)
Somewhere along the line, older generations convinced themselves Gen Z hates polish and only trusts wobbly iPhone clips filmed next to someone’s air fryer. As if shaky, poorly framed footage equals truth.
Younger audiences don’t reject polish. They reject performative bullshit. Big difference.
You can shoot something on an ARRI that feels real, or shoot it on an iPhone that feels staged. The hardware isn’t the tell. The intent is.
Production value still affects perception—lighting, audio, and pacing all signal competence. But authenticity sits above gloss now. Not because lo-fi is automatically better, but because mismatched polish instantly feels dishonest.
Younger audiences can spot the alignment between idea and execution instantly. That’s authenticity. Everything else is just old men yelling at TikTok. And nothing exposes that faster than a cheap ad beating an expensive one.
When a Low-Budget Video Beats the Expensive One
There’s a telling experiment where a brand shot the exact same ad three ways: a $1k version, a $10k version, and a $100k version. Same script, same runtime. The $10k one smoked the others, outpacing them in engagement and installs. Meanwhile, the $100k version routinely underperformed the $1k version—which stings if you’ve ever had to defend a budget.
It confirmed what creatives have known forever: people respond to emotional truth, clarity, and tone—not budget cosplay. The $100k version felt like it was trying way too hard; the $1k version felt cheap but honest.
The point isn’t “spend less.” It’s “spend right.” A big-budget project without a real idea is a disguise. A low-budget project without a real idea is clutter.
Creative, craft, and execution have to be in sync. When even one drifts, the whole thing wobbles, which is the basis of the Trinity.
A frame from the viral Marty Supreme Zoom-call ad. Chaotic, authentic, dirt cheap — and a masterclass in concept-first creative.
The Trinity: Concept × Craft × Execution
Marketers often cling to the fantasy of a single fix—a celebrity cameo, a fashionable track, a beautiful render—some production trick-of-the-month that supposedly elevates a weak idea. But none of those things solves the core problem. It’s still lipstick on a pig, and the pig is still sitting in shit.
The real driver of effectiveness never changes: Concept × Craft × Execution. It’s a Negroni—1:1:1. Get the ratio wrong and the whole thing turns bitter.
CONCEPT
The strategic and emotional spine. What it means, why it matters, and why anyone should care. If this is weak, everything built on it collapses.
CRAFT
Where taste shows up: tone, writing, pacing, design, music, animation. Craft is the difference between “nice try” and “holy hell.”
EXECUTION
The technical reality check. Camera, lighting, performance, edit, finish. It either supports the idea or betrays it.
If the concept sucks, nothing saves it.
If the craft is sloppy, the execution becomes a spotlight on the slop.
If the execution is off, the whole thing feels wrong, even if people can’t articulate why.
However, when all three align, brands produce work that outperforms budgets, channels, and even expectations.
That’s why the Marty Supreme “leaked Zoom call” was perfect. Dirt cheap. Conceptually deadly and crafted with controlled chaos. Executed with uncanny sincerity. A flawless Negroni.
To whoever thought this up, I say “Bravo!” And “I hate you.” Please give me a call so I can personally congratulate you. I want to make your babies.
And yet, nine times out of ten, the Trinity isn’t broken accidentally—it’s sacrificed at the altar of ‘stretching the dollar.’
The Myth of “Stretching the Dollar”
One of the biggest delusions in marketing is the belief that you can “stretch the dollar” by gutting production without touching the concept. (I addressed this tension in my earlier essays Creative vs The Hidden Hand Pt 1 & 2). I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve watched this predictable failure cycle through as though expecting a different ending.
We’ll get these beautiful, ambitious ideas—ideas that clearly need big sets, big lighting, big VFX, big everything—and then the budget meeting hits. Suddenly, everyone’s trying to jam a million-dollar idea into a $150k budget. It’s the “fat guy in a little coat” problem: funny in Tommy Boy, tragic in marketing.
And it cuts both ways. We’ll also get briefs asking for “DIY,” “lo-fi,” or “YouTube aesthetic” sprinkled in like salt on a bag of Dick’s fries. (If you’re not from Seattle: ‘I need a bag of Dick’s’ hits different here.)
If the idea needs a certain level of craft to land, stripping it down doesn’t make it “scrappy.” It makes it confusing. Sometimes off-brand. Always less credible.
Brands often don’t notice the damage because it happens slowly. Results sag. They compensate by making more stuff. They buy more tech. More targeting. More dashboards. More optimization knobs to twist.
But the issue sits quietly at the center: the work wasn’t good enough to earn attention.
The Hidden Cost of “Good Enough”
“Good enough” kills more marketing performance than any budget cut ever will.
It forces you to buy reach instead of earning it. It wastes team hours that should be advancing the brand. It pushes consumers to compete on price because you’ve given them nothing else to value.
“Good enough” is the most expensive creative you can make, because it traps your brand on a treadmill—more spend, more effort, and as forgettable as Aunt Josephine's Hobby Lobby-fueled scrapbooking.
Brands that invest in thoughtful creative don’t have this problem. Their work walks into the room on its own.
That’s where the payoff starts to show up in the numbers.
The Payoff: Pricing Power, Margin, and Long-Term Growth
When brands commit to creative that actually means something—not just visually pleasing, but strategically and emotionally sharp—they see real changes in the outcomes.
Because the idea really is everything: a strong concept builds desire, craft makes the brand memorable, and execution makes it believable. When those three work together, the results are unmistakable:
Your pricing power goes up.
Your brand affection climbs.
Your churn drops.
Your media dollars work harder.
People talk about you without being bribed.
Search volume lifts.
Your campaigns live longer, lowering the total cost of creativity.
Misaligned creative is a tax. Aligned creative is a multiplier.
If you want ROI, stop treating the Trinity like astrology and accept the evidence: this is how brands grow.
Make It Worth Making
If you take one thing from all this blathering, let it be this: aligned creative is profit. Misaligned creative is waste masquerading as work. Concept without craft is homework. Craft without execution is décor. Execution without concept is static.
But when they click? People remember you. Budgets go further. And the CFO suddenly talks about 'brand equity’ as if they discovered it. Make the work matter. Make it sharp. Make it true. Or do literally anything else with your day.
That's where the ROI lives. And the data doesn’t stutter.
Generative AI and the Role of Human Taste in Creative Direction
This essay explores the role of human taste in an era dominated by generative AI. A roadmap for creative leaders outlines how to harness AI tools without sacrificing strategy, authenticity, or impact.
Retail Marketing as Entertainment: How Experiential Retail Creates Emotional Pathways to Purchase